
Audio-Technica ATH-ANC23BK vs Tangzu Waner S.G: which should you buy?
On aggregated review scores the Tangzu Waner S.G comes out ahead with a HearWiki score of 82. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.
Score breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
Tangzu Waner S.G leads on 5 of 7 measures.
- Audio-Technica ATH-ANC23BK
- Tangzu Waner S.G
Specifications
- Type
- Wired IEMs
- Wired IEMs
- Price (USD)
- $34
- $19
- HearWiki score
- 45
- 82
- Released
- 2021
- 2022
- Availability
- Still sold new
- Still sold new
- Driver
- 13 mm driver
- 10 mm dynamic
- Driver type
- -
- dynamic
- Driver size
- 13 mm
- 10 mm
- Drivers per side
- 1
- -
- Frequency response
- 20 Hz - 20 kHz
- -
- Impedance
- 32 Ω
- 20 Ω
- Sensitivity
- 105 dB/mW
- -
- Active noise cancelling
- Yes
- -
- Weight
- 26 g
- 4 g
- USB-C
- No
- -
- Connector
- 3.5 mm
- -
What reviewers said
Audio-Technica ATH-ANC23BK
The ATH-ANC23BK are budget-friendly in-ear headphones with active noise cancellation, a 13 mm driver, and a wired 3.5 mm connection. They offer a neutral sound signature and good value for the price, though the noise-cancelling performance is modest and the cord-mounted module adds noticeable bulk. Fit is generally stable, but comfort may vary during longer listening sessions.
- Pro:Excellent value for the price
- Pro:Neutral, very good sound quality
- Pro:Stable fit once properly inserted
- Con:Noise cancellation is only fair, not ideal for loud offices
- Con:Bulky cord-mounted control module can feel heavy
- Con:Comfort may decline during extended wear
Tangzu Waner S.G
The Tangzu Waner S.G is a budget-friendly wired IEM with a compact, lightweight build and a 10mm dynamic driver. Its tuning leans warm and smooth, offering a relaxed, music-first sound that punches well above its price point for everyday listening.
- Pro:Warm, easygoing sound signature
- Pro:Very lightweight and compact
- Pro:Detachable 0.78mm two-pin cable
- Con:No active noise cancellation
- Con:Lacks water resistance
- Con:Not for those seeking technical detail
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.
