Skip to content
HearWiki

Audio-Technica A990z vs HiFiMAN Shangri-La Jr: which should you buy?

On aggregated review scores the HiFiMAN Shangri-La Jr comes out ahead with an HearWiki score of 88. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.

Our pick: HiFiMAN Shangri-La Jr - Outstanding overall at around $4000.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Audio-Technica A990z
Sound7.0
Value6.0
HiFiMAN Shangri-La Jr
Sound9.5
Value4.0

Specifications

Specification comparison of Audio-Technica A990z vs HiFiMAN Shangri-La Jr
SpecAudio-Technica A990zHiFiMAN Shangri-La Jr
TypeOver-EarOver-Ear
Price (USD)-$4,000
HearWiki score68 / 100 · Good88 / 100 · Outstanding
Released--
Audio
DriverdynamicElectrostatic
Driver size53 mm-
Drivers per side11
Frequency response5Hz-42kHz7Hz-120kHz
Sound signature-Bright neutral
Impedance44 Ω-
Sensitivity100 dB/mW-
Wireless
Multipoint pairingNo-
Features
Active noise cancellingNo-
Controlsbuttons-
Design
Weight330 g374 g
USB-CNo-

What reviewers said

Audio-Technica A990z

The Audio-Technica A990Z is a closed-back, over-ear headphone that prioritizes home listening and light mixing over portability, offering a spacious and detailed sound with low fatigue. Its tuning is polarizing, however, with some praising its clarity while others find it too bright and bass-heavy, and it's best suited for stationary use given its wired design and lack of travel-friendly features.

  • Pro:Spacious, detailed soundstage for a closed-back design
  • Pro:Very comfortable for long listening sessions
  • Pro:Strong passive isolation from ambient noise
  • Con:Bright and bass-heavy tuning that may not suit all music genres
  • Con:Not portable or travel-friendly due to wired-only design
  • Con:Imaging can be imprecise in some listening scenarios

HiFiMAN Shangri-La Jr

The HiFiMAN Shangri-La Jr is a premium electrostatic headphone that delivers an exceptionally detailed and transparent sound, leaning towards a bright-neutral tuning that emphasizes precision over warmth. Its lightweight build and high-frequency extension make it a technical powerhouse, though its performance demands a capable amplifier and may not suit listeners sensitive to treble energy.

  • Pro:Outstanding technical performance and clarity
  • Pro:Very lightweight for an electrostatic design
  • Pro:Extensive frequency response with airy highs
  • Con:Very expensive price point
  • Con:Bright tuning may be fatiguing for some
  • Con:Requires dedicated electrostatic amplifier

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.