Over-Ear
Audio-Technica A550z
72Good
Price n/a
Full review dataAudio-Technica A550z vs HiFiMAN Shangri-La Jr: which should you buy?
On aggregated review scores the HiFiMAN Shangri-La Jr comes out ahead with an HearWiki score of 88. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.
Our pick: HiFiMAN Shangri-La Jr - Outstanding overall at around $4000.
Over-Ear
HiFiMAN Shangri-La Jr
88Outstanding
$4,000
Full review dataScore breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
Audio-Technica A550z
Sound7.5
Value8.0
HiFiMAN Shangri-La Jr
Sound9.5
Value4.0
Specifications
| Spec | Audio-Technica A550z | HiFiMAN Shangri-La Jr |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Over-Ear | Over-Ear |
| Price (USD) | - | $4,000 |
| HearWiki score | 72 / 100 · Good | 88 / 100 · Outstanding |
| Released | - | - |
| Audio | ||
| Driver | dynamic | Electrostatic |
| Driver size | 53 mm | - |
| Drivers per side | 2 | 1 |
| Frequency response | 5Hz-35kHz | 7Hz-120kHz |
| Sound signature | - | Bright neutral |
| Impedance | 40 Ω | - |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB/mW | - |
| Wireless | ||
| Multipoint pairing | No | - |
| Features | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | - |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 360 g | 374 g |
| Foldable | No | - |
| Detachable cable | No | - |
| USB-C | No | - |
What reviewers said
Audio-Technica A550z
The Audio-Technica A550Z is a wired closed-back over-ear headphone that delivers a neutral, balanced sound with strong value for its price. Its 40-ohm impedance and 100 dB sensitivity make it easy to drive from phones, laptops, or dedicated amps, though it lacks modern conveniences like noise cancellation or detachable cables.
- Pro:Neutral, well-balanced sound signature
- Pro:Easy to drive from portable devices
- Pro:Solid build with comfortable fit
- Con:No noise cancellation or wireless support
- Con:Fixed cable cannot be replaced
- Con:Non-foldable design limits portability
HiFiMAN Shangri-La Jr
The HiFiMAN Shangri-La Jr is a premium electrostatic headphone that delivers an exceptionally detailed and transparent sound, leaning towards a bright-neutral tuning that emphasizes precision over warmth. Its lightweight build and high-frequency extension make it a technical powerhouse, though its performance demands a capable amplifier and may not suit listeners sensitive to treble energy.
- Pro:Outstanding technical performance and clarity
- Pro:Very lightweight for an electrostatic design
- Pro:Extensive frequency response with airy highs
- Con:Very expensive price point
- Con:Bright tuning may be fatiguing for some
- Con:Requires dedicated electrostatic amplifier
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.