Skip to content
HearWiki

Audeze Maxwell 2 vs Technics EAH-T300: which should you buy?

Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the Audeze Maxwell 2 vs Technics EAH-T300, side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Audeze Maxwell 2 leads on 5 of 6 measures.

  • Audeze Maxwell 2
  • Technics EAH-T300
HearWiki score
88
-
Sound
9.5
-
Battery
9.5
-
Calls
9.0
-
Value
7.5
-
Price (USD)
$330
$300

Generation & platform

The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?

Half a step newer

Audeze Maxwell 2 (2026) against Technics EAH-T300 (2015). The Audeze Maxwell 2 edges ahead on platform, but only just: ANC type Adaptive against None.

  • Maxwell 2202611 yr newer
  • EAH-T3002015
What differsMaxwell 2EAH-T300

Platform

ANC type
Adaptive
None

Specifications

Maxwell 2EAH-T300
Type
Over-Ear
Over-Ear
Price (USD)
$330
$300
HearWiki score
88
Not scored
Released
2026
2015
Availability
Sold new
Discontinued
Driver
90 mm planar magnetic
30 mm driver
Driver type
planar
-
Driver size
90 mm
30 mm
Drivers per side
1
-
Frequency response
10 Hz - 50 kHz
-
Impedance
-
125 Ω
Bluetooth
5.3
-
Codecs
SBC, AAC, LC3, LC3plus, LDAC
-
Multipoint pairing
Yes
-
Battery life
80 h
-
Battery life (ANC on)
35 h
-
Full charge time
120 min
-
Active noise cancelling
Yes
No
ANC type
adaptive
-
Transparency mode
Yes
-
Companion app
Yes
-
Custom EQ
Yes
-
Wear detection
No
-
Controls
buttons
-
Weight
560 g
260 g
USB-C
Yes
-
Model code
-
EAH-300
Microphones
2
-
Call noise reduction
Yes
-
Call NR technology
AI ENC
-

What reviewers said

Audeze Maxwell 2

No summary yet - we haven't aggregated enough reviews.

Technics EAH-T300

A vintage 1977 over-ear design from Technics, this wired headphone pairs a compact 30mm dynamic driver with a high 125-ohm impedance for a classic listening experience. It weighs a modest 260 grams and delivers a full 20Hz-20kHz frequency range, appealing to purists seeking retro audio gear without modern extras like noise cancellation.

  • Pro:Classic 1970s design with durable build
  • Pro:Lightweight at 260 grams
  • Pro:Full 20Hz-20kHz frequency response
  • Con:No active noise cancellation
  • Con:Wired only, no wireless options
  • Con:30mm driver may lack bass punch

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.