Skip to content
HearWiki

Audeze Maxwell 2 vs STAX SR-X1: which should you buy?

On aggregated review scores the Audeze Maxwell 2 comes out ahead with a HearWiki score of 88. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.

Our pick: Audeze Maxwell 2 - Outstanding overall at around $329.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Audeze Maxwell 2 leads on 6 of 6 measures.

  • Audeze Maxwell 2
  • STAX SR-X1
HearWiki score
88
71
Sound
9.5
8.4
Battery
9.5
-
Calls
9.0
-
Value
7.5
7.4
Price (USD)
$330
$410

Generation & platform

The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?

Half a step newer

Audeze Maxwell 2 (2026) against STAX SR-X1 (2020). The Audeze Maxwell 2 edges ahead on platform, but only just: ANC type Adaptive against None. It also adds USB-C.

  • Maxwell 220266 yr newer
  • SR-X12020
What differsMaxwell 2SR-X1

Platform

ANC type
Adaptive
None

Everyday features

USB-C
Yes
No

Specifications

Maxwell 2SR-X1
Type
Over-Ear
Over-Ear
Price (USD)
$330
$410
HearWiki score
88
71
Released
2026
2020
Availability
Sold new
Discontinued
Driver
90 mm planar magnetic
30 mm electrostatic
Driver type
planar
electrostatic
Driver size
90 mm
30 mm
Drivers per side
1
-
Frequency response
10 Hz - 50 kHz
7 Hz - 41 kHz
Impedance
-
145000 Ω
Sensitivity
-
101 dB/mW
Bluetooth
5.3
-
Codecs
SBC, AAC, LC3, LC3plus, LDAC
-
Multipoint pairing
Yes
-
Battery life
80 h
-
Battery life (ANC on)
35 h
-
Full charge time
120 min
-
Active noise cancelling
Yes
No
ANC type
adaptive
-
Transparency mode
Yes
-
Companion app
Yes
-
Custom EQ
Yes
-
Wear detection
No
-
Controls
buttons
-
Weight
560 g
234 g
Detachable cable
-
Yes
USB-C
Yes
No
Microphones
2
-
Call noise reduction
Yes
-
Call NR technology
AI ENC
-

What reviewers said

Audeze Maxwell 2

No summary yet - we haven't aggregated enough reviews.

STAX SR-X1

The STAX SR-X1 is an affordable entry point into the world of electrostatic headphones, delivering exceptionally fast, detailed, and transparent sound with a balanced tonal character. It offers a spacious and neutral presentation that remains lightweight and comfortable for extended listening, though it requires an external electrostatic amplifier and is not suited for portable use. While its bass is less impactful than dynamic counterparts, it still impresses with surprising low-end authority for an electrostatic design.

  • Pro:Exceptional speed, detail, and transparency
  • Pro:Lightweight and comfortable for long sessions
  • Pro:Spacious and neutral soundstage
  • Con:Requires a dedicated electrostatic amplifier
  • Con:Not portable-friendly due to wired, open design
  • Con:Bass impact is less than dynamic headphones

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.