Skip to content
HearWiki

Audeze Maxwell 2 vs STAX SR-5 Gold BK: which should you buy?

Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the Audeze Maxwell 2 vs STAX SR-5 Gold BK, side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Audeze Maxwell 2 leads on 6 of 6 measures.

  • Audeze Maxwell 2
  • STAX SR-5 Gold BK
HearWiki score
88
-
Sound
9.5
-
Battery
9.5
-
Calls
9.0
-
Value
7.5
-
Price (USD)
$330
-

Generation & platform

The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?

Half a step newer

Audeze Maxwell 2 (2026) against STAX SR-5 Gold BK (1980). The Audeze Maxwell 2 edges ahead on platform, but only just: ANC type Adaptive against None.

  • Maxwell 2202646 yr newer
  • SR-5 Gold BK1980
What differsMaxwell 2SR-5 Gold BK

Platform

ANC type
Adaptive
None

Specifications

Maxwell 2SR-5 Gold BK
Type
Over-Ear
Over-Ear
Price (USD)
$330
-
HearWiki score
88
Not scored
Released
2026
1980
Availability
Sold new
Discontinued
Driver
90 mm planar magnetic
electrostatic
Driver type
planar
electrostatic
Driver size
90 mm
-
Drivers per side
1
-
Frequency response
10 Hz - 50 kHz
-
Bluetooth
5.3
-
Codecs
SBC, AAC, LC3, LC3plus, LDAC
-
Multipoint pairing
Yes
-
Battery life
80 h
-
Battery life (ANC on)
35 h
-
Full charge time
120 min
-
Active noise cancelling
Yes
-
ANC type
adaptive
-
Transparency mode
Yes
-
Companion app
Yes
-
Custom EQ
Yes
-
Wear detection
No
-
Controls
buttons
-
Weight
560 g
300 g
USB-C
Yes
-
Microphones
2
-
Call noise reduction
Yes
-
Call NR technology
AI ENC
-

What reviewers said

Audeze Maxwell 2

No summary yet - we haven't aggregated enough reviews.

STAX SR-5 Gold BK

The STAX SR-5 Gold BK is a vintage electrostatic headphone from 1980, distinguished by its black finish and gold-toned metal accents. It operates on a 200V bias system and delivers a sound profile consistent with its sibling model, the SR-5 Gold. As a wired, open-back design, it requires a dedicated electrostatic amplifier to function.

  • Pro:Classic electrostatic clarity and detail
  • Pro:Lightweight at 300g for comfortable wear
  • Pro:Distinctive retro aesthetic with gold accents
  • Con:Requires a specialized electrostatic amp
  • Con:No noise cancellation or wireless features
  • Con:Vintage design may lack modern ergonomics

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.