Skip to content
HearWiki

Audeze Maxwell 2 vs STAX New SR-3: which should you buy?

Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the Audeze Maxwell 2 vs STAX New SR-3, side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Audeze Maxwell 2 leads on 6 of 6 measures.

  • Audeze Maxwell 2
  • STAX New SR-3
HearWiki score
88
-
Sound
9.5
-
Battery
9.5
-
Calls
9.0
-
Value
7.5
-
Price (USD)
$330
-

Generation & platform

The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?

Half a step newer

Audeze Maxwell 2 (2026) against STAX New SR-3 (1971). The Audeze Maxwell 2 edges ahead on platform, but only just: ANC type Adaptive against None.

  • Maxwell 2202655 yr newer
  • New SR-31971
What differsMaxwell 2New SR-3

Platform

ANC type
Adaptive
None

Specifications

Maxwell 2New SR-3
Type
Over-Ear
Over-Ear
Price (USD)
$330
-
HearWiki score
88
Not scored
Released
2026
1971
Availability
Sold new
Discontinued
Driver
90 mm planar magnetic
electrostatic
Driver type
planar
electrostatic
Driver size
90 mm
-
Drivers per side
1
-
Frequency response
10 Hz - 50 kHz
30 Hz - 25 kHz
Impedance
-
130000 Ω
Sensitivity (dB/Vrms)
-
100
Bluetooth
5.3
-
Codecs
SBC, AAC, LC3, LC3plus, LDAC
-
Multipoint pairing
Yes
-
Battery life
80 h
-
Battery life (ANC on)
35 h
-
Full charge time
120 min
-
Active noise cancelling
Yes
-
ANC type
adaptive
-
Transparency mode
Yes
-
Companion app
Yes
-
Custom EQ
Yes
-
Wear detection
No
-
Controls
buttons
-
Weight
560 g
290 g
USB-C
Yes
-
Microphones
2
-
Call noise reduction
Yes
-
Call NR technology
AI ENC
-

What reviewers said

Audeze Maxwell 2

No summary yet - we haven't aggregated enough reviews.

STAX New SR-3

The Stax New SR-3 are vintage electrostatic over-ear headphones from the early 1970s, prized for their precise tonal balance and clear instrument separation. They demand a dedicated energizer and amplifier setup, making them a niche choice for audiophiles with the right gear. Their high impedance and wired design reflect their era, delivering a pure, unprocessed sound.

  • Pro:Excellent tonal accuracy
  • Pro:Great instrument separation
  • Pro:Classic electrostatic detail
  • Con:Requires dedicated energizer
  • Con:Very high impedance
  • Con:No modern features like ANC

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.