Audeze Maxwell 2 vs STAX New SR-3: which should you buy?
Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the Audeze Maxwell 2 vs STAX New SR-3, side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.
Score breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
Audeze Maxwell 2 leads on 6 of 6 measures.
- Audeze Maxwell 2
- STAX New SR-3
Generation & platform
The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?
Audeze Maxwell 2 (2026) against STAX New SR-3 (1971). The Audeze Maxwell 2 edges ahead on platform, but only just: ANC type Adaptive against None.
- Maxwell 2202655 yr newer
- New SR-31971
- ANC type
- Adaptive
- None
Platform
Specifications
- Type
- Over-Ear
- Over-Ear
- Price (USD)
- $330
- -
- HearWiki score
- 88
- Not scored
- Released
- 2026
- 1971
- Availability
- Sold new
- Discontinued
- Driver
- 90 mm planar magnetic
- electrostatic
- Driver type
- planar
- electrostatic
- Driver size
- 90 mm
- -
- Drivers per side
- 1
- -
- Frequency response
- 10 Hz - 50 kHz
- 30 Hz - 25 kHz
- Impedance
- -
- 130000 Ω
- Sensitivity (dB/Vrms)
- -
- 100
- Bluetooth
- 5.3
- -
- Codecs
- SBC, AAC, LC3, LC3plus, LDAC
- -
- Multipoint pairing
- Yes
- -
- Battery life
- 80 h
- -
- Battery life (ANC on)
- 35 h
- -
- Full charge time
- 120 min
- -
- Active noise cancelling
- Yes
- -
- ANC type
- adaptive
- -
- Transparency mode
- Yes
- -
- Companion app
- Yes
- -
- Custom EQ
- Yes
- -
- Wear detection
- No
- -
- Controls
- buttons
- -
- Weight
- 560 g
- 290 g
- USB-C
- Yes
- -
- Microphones
- 2
- -
- Call noise reduction
- Yes
- -
- Call NR technology
- AI ENC
- -
What reviewers said
Audeze Maxwell 2
No summary yet - we haven't aggregated enough reviews.
STAX New SR-3
The Stax New SR-3 are vintage electrostatic over-ear headphones from the early 1970s, prized for their precise tonal balance and clear instrument separation. They demand a dedicated energizer and amplifier setup, making them a niche choice for audiophiles with the right gear. Their high impedance and wired design reflect their era, delivering a pure, unprocessed sound.
- Pro:Excellent tonal accuracy
- Pro:Great instrument separation
- Pro:Classic electrostatic detail
- Con:Requires dedicated energizer
- Con:Very high impedance
- Con:No modern features like ANC
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.