Skip to content
HearWiki

Audeze Maxwell 2 vs Sennheiser HD 300: which should you buy?

On aggregated review scores the Audeze Maxwell 2 comes out ahead with a HearWiki score of 88. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.

Our pick: Audeze Maxwell 2 - Outstanding overall at around $329.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Audeze Maxwell 2 leads on 5 of 6 measures.

  • Audeze Maxwell 2
  • Sennheiser HD 300
HearWiki score
88
59
Sound
9.5
6.4
Battery
9.5
-
Calls
9.0
-
Value
7.5
-
Price (USD)
$330
$220

Generation & platform

The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?

Half a step newer

Audeze Maxwell 2 (2026) against Sennheiser HD 300 (2019). The Audeze Maxwell 2 edges ahead on platform, but only just: ANC type Adaptive against None.

  • Maxwell 220267 yr newer
  • HD 3002019
What differsMaxwell 2HD 300

Platform

ANC type
Adaptive
None

Specifications

Maxwell 2HD 300
Type
Over-Ear
Over-Ear
Price (USD)
$330
$220
HearWiki score
88
59
Released
2026
2019
Availability
Sold new
Still sold new
Driver
90 mm planar magnetic
32 mm dynamic
Driver type
planar
dynamic
Driver size
90 mm
32 mm
Drivers per side
1
-
Frequency response
10 Hz - 50 kHz
6 Hz - 25 kHz
Impedance
-
64 Ω
Sensitivity (dB/Vrms)
-
108
Bluetooth
5.3
-
Codecs
SBC, AAC, LC3, LC3plus, LDAC
-
Multipoint pairing
Yes
-
Battery life
80 h
-
Battery life (ANC on)
35 h
-
Full charge time
120 min
-
Active noise cancelling
Yes
No
ANC type
adaptive
-
Transparency mode
Yes
-
Companion app
Yes
-
Custom EQ
Yes
-
Wear detection
No
-
Controls
buttons
-
Weight
560 g
297 g
USB-C
Yes
-
Microphones
2
-
Call noise reduction
Yes
-
Call NR technology
AI ENC
-

What reviewers said

Audeze Maxwell 2

No summary yet - we haven't aggregated enough reviews.

Sennheiser HD 300

The Sennheiser HD 300 is a wired, closed-back over-ear headphone designed for reliable monitoring and portable studio work. It combines a lightweight, easy-to-drive build with strong passive isolation and a balanced, detailed sound signature, making it a practical choice for tracking, mixing, and on-the-go use.

  • Pro:Strong passive isolation for focused listening
  • Pro:Natural, well-balanced sound with good detail
  • Pro:Easy to drive from portable devices
  • Con:Cable length may be too short for some setups
  • Con:No active noise cancellation
  • Con:Closed-back design may limit soundstage width

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.