Skip to content
HearWiki

Audeze Maxwell 2 vs Grado SR325: which should you buy?

On aggregated review scores the Audeze Maxwell 2 comes out ahead with a HearWiki score of 88. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.

Our pick: Audeze Maxwell 2 - Outstanding overall at around $329.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Audeze Maxwell 2 leads on 6 of 6 measures.

  • Audeze Maxwell 2
  • Grado SR325
HearWiki score
88
73
Sound
9.5
8.1
Battery
9.5
-
Calls
9.0
-
Value
7.5
6.4
Price (USD)
$330
$350

Generation & platform

The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?

Half a step newer

Audeze Maxwell 2 (2026) against Grado SR325 (2025). The Audeze Maxwell 2 edges ahead on platform, but only just: ANC type Adaptive against None.

  • Maxwell 220261 yr newer
  • SR3252025
What differsMaxwell 2SR325

Platform

ANC type
Adaptive
None

Specifications

Maxwell 2SR325
Type
Over-Ear
Over-Ear
Price (USD)
$330
$350
HearWiki score
88
73
Released
2026
2025
Availability
Sold new
Sold new
Driver
90 mm planar magnetic
44 mm dynamic
Driver type
planar
dynamic
Driver size
90 mm
44 mm
Drivers per side
1
1
Frequency response
10 Hz - 50 kHz
18 Hz - 24 kHz
Impedance
-
38 Ω
Sensitivity
-
98 dB/mW
Bluetooth
5.3
-
Codecs
SBC, AAC, LC3, LC3plus, LDAC
-
Multipoint pairing
Yes
-
Battery life
80 h
-
Battery life (ANC on)
35 h
-
Full charge time
120 min
-
Active noise cancelling
Yes
No
ANC type
adaptive
-
Transparency mode
Yes
-
Companion app
Yes
-
Custom EQ
Yes
-
Wear detection
No
-
Controls
buttons
-
Weight
560 g
280 g
USB-C
Yes
-
Microphones
2
-
Call noise reduction
Yes
-
Call NR technology
AI ENC
-

What reviewers said

Audeze Maxwell 2

No summary yet - we haven't aggregated enough reviews.

Grado SR325

The Grado SR325 is an open-back, wired headphone designed for critical listening, delivering a detailed and spacious soundstage with strong instrument separation. Its lightweight, solid build and high sensitivity make it easy to drive from most sources, though its open design offers minimal isolation and significant sound leakage. This model is best suited for quiet home environments rather than on-the-go use.

  • Pro:Clear and detailed open sound with good instrument separation
  • Pro:Lightweight yet solid construction
  • Pro:Easy to drive with standard audio devices
  • Con:Poor noise isolation and high sound leakage
  • Con:Can slip off the head easily during movement
  • Con:Earpads may come loose over time

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.