Over-Ear
Audeze Maxwell 2
88Outstanding
$330
Full review dataAudeze Maxwell 2 vs Beyerdynamic DT-48A: which should you buy?
Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the Audeze Maxwell 2 vs Beyerdynamic DT-48A, side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.
Score breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
Audeze Maxwell 2 leads on 6 of 6 measures.
- Audeze Maxwell 2
- Beyerdynamic DT-48A
HearWiki score
88
-
Sound
9.5
-
Battery
9.5
-
Calls
9.0
-
Value
7.5
-
Price (USD)
$330
$530
Generation & platform
The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?
Half a step newer
The Audeze Maxwell 2 edges ahead on platform, but only just: ANC type Adaptive against None.
- Maxwell 22026
- DT-48AYear unknown
What differsMaxwell 2DT-48A
- ANC type
- Adaptive
- None
Platform
Specifications
Maxwell 2DT-48A
- Type
- Over-Ear
- Over-Ear
- Price (USD)
- $330
- $530
- HearWiki score
- 88
- Not scored
- Released
- 2026
- -
- Availability
- Sold new
- Availability unknown
- Driver
- 90 mm planar magnetic
- -
- Driver type
- planar
- -
- Driver size
- 90 mm
- -
- Drivers per side
- 1
- -
- Frequency response
- 10 Hz - 50 kHz
- -
- Impedance
- -
- 5 Ω
- Bluetooth
- 5.3
- -
- Codecs
- SBC, AAC, LC3, LC3plus, LDAC
- -
- Multipoint pairing
- Yes
- -
- Battery life
- 80 h
- -
- Battery life (ANC on)
- 35 h
- -
- Full charge time
- 120 min
- -
- Active noise cancelling
- Yes
- -
- ANC type
- adaptive
- -
- Transparency mode
- Yes
- -
- Companion app
- Yes
- -
- Custom EQ
- Yes
- -
- Wear detection
- No
- -
- Controls
- buttons
- -
- Weight
- 560 g
- -
- USB-C
- Yes
- -
- Microphones
- 2
- -
- Call noise reduction
- Yes
- -
- Call NR technology
- AI ENC
- -
What reviewers said
Audeze Maxwell 2
No summary yet - we haven't aggregated enough reviews.
Beyerdynamic DT-48A
The Beyerdynamic DT-48A is a vintage wired over-ear headphone, originally designed for audiometric testing and first introduced in 1937. It delivers a very clean, clear, and distortion-free sound with an exceptionally smooth midrange, but its stock round rubber pads virtually eliminate bass response. This is a niche, retro choice for listeners who prioritize midrange clarity over low-end presence.
- Pro:Extremely clean and clear sound
- Pro:Smooth, natural midrange
- Pro:Low distortion even at higher volumes
- Con:Essentially no bass with stock pads
- Con:Very low 5-ohm impedance may require a specific amp
- Con:No active noise cancellation or wireless features
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.