Skip to content
HearWiki

Audeze Maxwell 2 vs Beyerdynamic DT 100: which should you buy?

On aggregated review scores the Audeze Maxwell 2 comes out ahead with a HearWiki score of 88. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.

Our pick: Audeze Maxwell 2 - Outstanding overall at around $329.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Audeze Maxwell 2 leads on 5 of 6 measures.

  • Audeze Maxwell 2
  • Beyerdynamic DT 100
HearWiki score
88
38
Sound
9.5
4.3
Battery
9.5
-
Calls
9.0
-
Value
7.5
2.5
Price (USD)
$330
$250

Generation & platform

The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?

Half a step newer

Audeze Maxwell 2 (2026) against Beyerdynamic DT 100 (2019). The Audeze Maxwell 2 edges ahead on platform, but only just: ANC type Adaptive against None.

  • Maxwell 220267 yr newer
  • DT 1002019
What differsMaxwell 2DT 100

Platform

ANC type
Adaptive
None

Specifications

Maxwell 2DT 100
Type
Over-Ear
Over-Ear
Price (USD)
$330
$250
HearWiki score
88
38
Released
2026
2019
Availability
Sold new
Still sold new
Driver
90 mm planar magnetic
dynamic
Driver type
planar
dynamic
Driver size
90 mm
-
Drivers per side
1
1
Frequency response
10 Hz - 50 kHz
-
Impedance
-
16 Ω
Bluetooth
5.3
-
Codecs
SBC, AAC, LC3, LC3plus, LDAC
-
Multipoint pairing
Yes
-
Battery life
80 h
-
Battery life (ANC on)
35 h
-
Full charge time
120 min
-
Active noise cancelling
Yes
No
ANC type
adaptive
-
Transparency mode
Yes
-
Companion app
Yes
-
Custom EQ
Yes
-
Wear detection
No
-
Controls
buttons
-
Weight
560 g
350 g
Detachable cable
-
Yes
USB-C
Yes
-
Connector
-
6.35 mm
Microphones
2
-
Call noise reduction
Yes
-
Call NR technology
AI ENC
-

What reviewers said

Audeze Maxwell 2

No summary yet - we haven't aggregated enough reviews.

Beyerdynamic DT 100

The Beyerdynamic DT 100 is a wired, closed-back studio headphone built for reliable monitoring in tracking and broadcast environments. Its rugged, workmanlike design and strong passive isolation make it a long-standing industry staple, though its 16-ohm version still benefits from a decent amp to sound its best. Overall, it delivers a practical, clear sound profile that prioritizes function over flair.

  • Pro:Extremely durable, tank-like build quality
  • Pro:Excellent passive sound isolation for studio use
  • Pro:Clear, honest monitoring sound for vocals and instruments
  • Con:Requires a decent amplifier despite low impedance
  • Con:Sound signature is dry and utilitarian, not for casual listening
  • Con:Outdated comfort and fit compared to modern designs

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.