Skip to content
HearWiki

Audeze Maxwell 2 vs Audio-Technica A990z: which should you buy?

On aggregated review scores the Audeze Maxwell 2 comes out ahead with a HearWiki score of 88. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.

Our pick: Audeze Maxwell 2 - Outstanding overall at around $329.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Audeze Maxwell 2 leads on 4 of 6 measures.

  • Audeze Maxwell 2
  • Audio-Technica A990z
HearWiki score
88
77
Sound
9.5
8.2
Battery
9.5
-
Calls
9.0
-
Value
7.5
7.5
Price (USD)
$330
$250

Generation & platform

The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?

Half a step newer

Audeze Maxwell 2 (2026) against Audio-Technica A990z (2025). The Audeze Maxwell 2 edges ahead on platform, but only just: ANC type Adaptive against None. It also adds USB-C.

  • Maxwell 220261 yr newer
  • A990z2025
What differsMaxwell 2A990z

Platform

ANC type
Adaptive
None

Everyday features

USB-C
Yes
No

Specifications

Maxwell 2A990z
Type
Over-Ear
Over-Ear
Price (USD)
$330
$250
HearWiki score
88
77
Released
2026
2025
Availability
Sold new
Sold new
Driver
90 mm planar magnetic
53 mm dynamic
Driver type
planar
dynamic
Driver size
90 mm
53 mm
Drivers per side
1
1
Frequency response
10 Hz - 50 kHz
5 Hz - 42 kHz
Impedance
-
44 Ω
Sensitivity
-
100 dB/mW
Bluetooth
5.3
-
Codecs
SBC, AAC, LC3, LC3plus, LDAC
-
Multipoint pairing
Yes
-
Battery life
80 h
-
Battery life (ANC on)
35 h
-
Full charge time
120 min
-
Active noise cancelling
Yes
No
ANC type
adaptive
-
Transparency mode
Yes
-
Companion app
Yes
-
Custom EQ
Yes
-
Wear detection
No
-
Controls
buttons
buttons
Weight
560 g
335 g
USB-C
Yes
No
Connector
-
3.5 mm
Microphones
2
-
Call noise reduction
Yes
-
Call NR technology
AI ENC
-

What reviewers said

Audeze Maxwell 2

No summary yet - we haven't aggregated enough reviews.

Audio-Technica A990z

The Audio-Technica A990Z is a wired, closed-back over-ear headphone built for stationary listening and studio-style use, prioritizing comfort and sound quality over portability. It delivers a spacious presentation with strong detail and a wide frequency range, though its tuning leans bright with a pronounced low end, which may not suit all music genres. Its solid isolation and sturdy build make it a viable option for home sessions and light mixing, but it’s not designed for on-the-go use.

  • Pro:Excellent passive isolation for a closed-back design
  • Pro:Comfortable fit suitable for extended listening sessions
  • Pro:Spacious and detailed soundstage for a closed-back model
  • Con:Bright and bass-heavy tuning may not suit all musical tastes
  • Con:Wired-only design with no ANC limits portability
  • Con:Imaging can be inconsistent, and bass may come across as boomy

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.