Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC vs Technics EAH-T300: which should you buy?
Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC vs Technics EAH-T300, side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.
Score breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC leads on 6 of 7 measures.
- Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC
- Technics EAH-T300
Generation & platform
The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?
Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC (2026) against Technics EAH-T300 (2015). The Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC edges ahead on platform, but only just: ANC type Adaptive against None.
- Maxwell 2 ANC202611 yr newer
- EAH-T3002015
- ANC type
- Adaptive
- None
Platform
Specifications
- Type
- Over-Ear
- Over-Ear
- Price (USD)
- $430
- $300
- HearWiki score
- 88
- Not scored
- Released
- 2026
- 2015
- Availability
- Sold new
- Discontinued
- Driver
- 90 mm planar magnetic
- 30 mm driver
- Driver type
- planar
- -
- Driver size
- 90 mm
- 30 mm
- Drivers per side
- 1
- -
- Frequency response
- 10 Hz - 50 kHz
- -
- Impedance
- -
- 125 Ω
- Sensitivity
- 115 dB/mW
- -
- Bluetooth
- 5.3
- -
- Codecs
- SBC, AAC, LC3, LC3plus, LDAC
- -
- Multipoint pairing
- Yes
- -
- Battery life
- 40 h
- -
- Battery life (ANC on)
- 35 h
- -
- Full charge time
- 120 min
- -
- Active noise cancelling
- Yes
- No
- ANC type
- adaptive
- -
- Transparency mode
- Yes
- -
- Companion app
- Yes
- -
- Custom EQ
- Yes
- -
- Wear detection
- No
- -
- Controls
- both
- -
- Weight
- 560 g
- 260 g
- USB-C
- Yes
- -
- Model code
- -
- EAH-300
- Microphones
- 2
- -
- Call noise reduction
- Yes
- -
- Call NR technology
- AI ENC
- -
What reviewers said
Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC
No summary yet - we haven't aggregated enough reviews.
Technics EAH-T300
A vintage 1977 over-ear design from Technics, this wired headphone pairs a compact 30mm dynamic driver with a high 125-ohm impedance for a classic listening experience. It weighs a modest 260 grams and delivers a full 20Hz-20kHz frequency range, appealing to purists seeking retro audio gear without modern extras like noise cancellation.
- Pro:Classic 1970s design with durable build
- Pro:Lightweight at 260 grams
- Pro:Full 20Hz-20kHz frequency response
- Con:No active noise cancellation
- Con:Wired only, no wireless options
- Con:30mm driver may lack bass punch
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.