Skip to content
HearWiki

Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC vs STAX SR-X5: which should you buy?

Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC vs STAX SR-X5, side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC leads on 7 of 7 measures.

  • Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC
  • STAX SR-X5
HearWiki score
88
-
Sound
9.3
-
Noise cancelling
8.5
-
Battery
8.0
-
Calls
9.0
-
Value
6.5
-
Price (USD)
$430
$500

Generation & platform

The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?

Half a step newer

Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC (2026) against STAX SR-X5 (1976). The Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC edges ahead on platform, but only just: ANC type Adaptive against None.

  • Maxwell 2 ANC202650 yr newer
  • SR-X51976
What differsMaxwell 2 ANCSR-X5

Platform

ANC type
Adaptive
None

Specifications

Maxwell 2 ANCSR-X5
Type
Over-Ear
Over-Ear
Price (USD)
$430
$500
HearWiki score
88
Not scored
Released
2026
1976
Availability
Sold new
Discontinued
Driver
90 mm planar magnetic
electrostatic
Driver type
planar
electrostatic
Driver size
90 mm
-
Drivers per side
1
-
Frequency response
10 Hz - 50 kHz
-
Sensitivity
115 dB/mW
-
Bluetooth
5.3
-
Codecs
SBC, AAC, LC3, LC3plus, LDAC
-
Multipoint pairing
Yes
-
Battery life
40 h
-
Battery life (ANC on)
35 h
-
Full charge time
120 min
-
Active noise cancelling
Yes
No
ANC type
adaptive
-
Transparency mode
Yes
-
Companion app
Yes
-
Custom EQ
Yes
-
Wear detection
No
-
Controls
both
-
Weight
560 g
390 g
USB-C
Yes
-
Model code
-
SR-5
Microphones
2
-
Call noise reduction
Yes
-
Call NR technology
AI ENC
-

What reviewers said

Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC

No summary yet - we haven't aggregated enough reviews.

STAX SR-X5

The STAX SR-X5 is a classic electrostatic over-ear headphone from the late 1970s, offering a detailed and airy sound signature typical of the technology. It is a wired-only model that requires a dedicated electrostatic amplifier or adaptor to operate, making it a niche choice for audiophiles. Weighing 390 grams, it provides a lightweight listening experience but lacks modern conveniences like noise cancellation or wireless connectivity.

  • Pro:Detailed and transparent electrostatic sound
  • Pro:Lightweight design at 390g
  • Pro:Classic build with historical appeal
  • Con:Requires external electrostatic amplifier or adaptor
  • Con:No noise cancellation or wireless features
  • Con:Older design may lack modern comfort refinements

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.