Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC vs STAX SR-X1: which should you buy?
On aggregated review scores the Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC comes out ahead with a HearWiki score of 88. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.
Score breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC leads on 5 of 7 measures.
- Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC
- STAX SR-X1
Generation & platform
The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?
Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC (2026) against STAX SR-X1 (2020). The Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC edges ahead on platform, but only just: ANC type Adaptive against None. It also adds USB-C.
- Maxwell 2 ANC20266 yr newer
- SR-X12020
- ANC type
- Adaptive
- None
- USB-C
- Yes
- No
Platform
Everyday features
Specifications
- Type
- Over-Ear
- Over-Ear
- Price (USD)
- $430
- $410
- HearWiki score
- 88
- 71
- Released
- 2026
- 2020
- Availability
- Sold new
- Discontinued
- Driver
- 90 mm planar magnetic
- 30 mm electrostatic
- Driver type
- planar
- electrostatic
- Driver size
- 90 mm
- 30 mm
- Drivers per side
- 1
- -
- Frequency response
- 10 Hz - 50 kHz
- 7 Hz - 41 kHz
- Impedance
- -
- 145000 Ω
- Sensitivity
- 115 dB/mW
- 101 dB/mW
- Bluetooth
- 5.3
- -
- Codecs
- SBC, AAC, LC3, LC3plus, LDAC
- -
- Multipoint pairing
- Yes
- -
- Battery life
- 40 h
- -
- Battery life (ANC on)
- 35 h
- -
- Full charge time
- 120 min
- -
- Active noise cancelling
- Yes
- No
- ANC type
- adaptive
- -
- Transparency mode
- Yes
- -
- Companion app
- Yes
- -
- Custom EQ
- Yes
- -
- Wear detection
- No
- -
- Controls
- both
- -
- Weight
- 560 g
- 234 g
- Detachable cable
- -
- Yes
- USB-C
- Yes
- No
- Microphones
- 2
- -
- Call noise reduction
- Yes
- -
- Call NR technology
- AI ENC
- -
What reviewers said
Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC
No summary yet - we haven't aggregated enough reviews.
STAX SR-X1
The STAX SR-X1 is an affordable entry point into the world of electrostatic headphones, delivering exceptionally fast, detailed, and transparent sound with a balanced tonal character. It offers a spacious and neutral presentation that remains lightweight and comfortable for extended listening, though it requires an external electrostatic amplifier and is not suited for portable use. While its bass is less impactful than dynamic counterparts, it still impresses with surprising low-end authority for an electrostatic design.
- Pro:Exceptional speed, detail, and transparency
- Pro:Lightweight and comfortable for long sessions
- Pro:Spacious and neutral soundstage
- Con:Requires a dedicated electrostatic amplifier
- Con:Not portable-friendly due to wired, open design
- Con:Bass impact is less than dynamic headphones
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.
