Skip to content
HearWiki

Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC vs Grado RS1: which should you buy?

On aggregated review scores the Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC comes out ahead with a HearWiki score of 88. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.

Our pick: Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC - Outstanding overall at around $429.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC leads on 6 of 7 measures.

  • Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC
  • Grado RS1
HearWiki score
88
76
Sound
9.3
8.7
Noise cancelling
8.5
-
Battery
8.0
-
Calls
9.0
-
Value
6.5
6.6
Price (USD)
$430
$750

Generation & platform

The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?

Half a step newer

Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC (2026) against Grado RS1 (2024). The Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC edges ahead on platform, but only just: ANC type Adaptive against None.

  • Maxwell 2 ANC20262 yr newer
  • RS12024
What differsMaxwell 2 ANCRS1

Platform

ANC type
Adaptive
None

Specifications

Maxwell 2 ANCRS1
Type
Over-Ear
Over-Ear
Price (USD)
$430
$750
HearWiki score
88
76
Released
2026
2024
Availability
Sold new
Still sold new
Driver
90 mm planar magnetic
50 mm dynamic
Driver type
planar
dynamic
Driver size
90 mm
50 mm
Drivers per side
1
1
Frequency response
10 Hz - 50 kHz
12 Hz - 30 kHz
Impedance
-
38 Ω
Sensitivity
115 dB/mW
99.8 dB/mW
Bluetooth
5.3
-
Codecs
SBC, AAC, LC3, LC3plus, LDAC
-
Multipoint pairing
Yes
-
Battery life
40 h
-
Battery life (ANC on)
35 h
-
Full charge time
120 min
-
Active noise cancelling
Yes
No
ANC type
adaptive
-
Transparency mode
Yes
-
Companion app
Yes
-
Custom EQ
Yes
-
Wear detection
No
-
Controls
both
-
Weight
560 g
255 g
USB-C
Yes
-
Microphones
2
-
Call noise reduction
Yes
-
Call NR technology
AI ENC
-

What reviewers said

Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC

No summary yet - we haven't aggregated enough reviews.

Grado RS1

The Grado RS1 is a premium open-back headphone known for its warm, organic midrange and lively, engaging sound that prioritizes musical enjoyment over clinical analysis. Handcrafted wooden housings and a lightweight build contribute to its premium feel, though its open-back nature means significant sound leakage. While it excels with most genres, its forward presentation can be less ideal for classical or chamber music, and comfort and ergonomics are somewhat polarizing.

  • Pro:Lush, organic midrange with natural timbre
  • Pro:Engaging, lively presentation that makes music enjoyable
  • Pro:Lightweight and comfortable for extended listening
  • Con:Open-back design leaks sound significantly
  • Con:Forward presentation may not suit classical or chamber music
  • Con:Comfort and fit can vary depending on ear placement

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.