Skip to content
HearWiki

Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC vs Grado PS500e: which should you buy?

On aggregated review scores the Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC comes out ahead with a HearWiki score of 88. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.

Our pick: Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC - Outstanding overall at around $429.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC leads on 7 of 7 measures.

  • Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC
  • Grado PS500e
HearWiki score
88
62
Sound
9.3
7.8
Noise cancelling
8.5
-
Battery
8.0
-
Calls
9.0
-
Value
6.5
4.2
Price (USD)
$430
$600

Generation & platform

The scores rank quality. This is the other question: is the newer one actually newer technology, or the same platform in a new shell?

Half a step newer

Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC (2026) against Grado PS500e (2020). The Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC edges ahead on platform, but only just: ANC type Adaptive against None.

  • Maxwell 2 ANC20266 yr newer
  • PS500e2020
What differsMaxwell 2 ANCPS500e

Platform

ANC type
Adaptive
None

Specifications

Maxwell 2 ANCPS500e
Type
Over-Ear
Over-Ear
Price (USD)
$430
$600
HearWiki score
88
62
Released
2026
2020
Availability
Sold new
Discontinued
Driver
90 mm planar magnetic
44 mm dynamic
Driver type
planar
dynamic
Driver size
90 mm
44 mm
Drivers per side
1
1
Frequency response
10 Hz - 50 kHz
14 Hz - 29 kHz
Impedance
-
32 Ω
Sensitivity
115 dB/mW
-
Bluetooth
5.3
-
Codecs
SBC, AAC, LC3, LC3plus, LDAC
-
Multipoint pairing
Yes
-
Battery life
40 h
-
Battery life (ANC on)
35 h
-
Full charge time
120 min
-
Active noise cancelling
Yes
No
ANC type
adaptive
-
Transparency mode
Yes
-
Companion app
Yes
-
Custom EQ
Yes
-
Wear detection
No
-
Controls
both
none
Weight
560 g
-
USB-C
Yes
-
Connector
-
6.35 mm
Microphones
2
-
Call noise reduction
Yes
-
Call NR technology
AI ENC
-

What reviewers said

Audeze Maxwell 2 ANC

No summary yet - we haven't aggregated enough reviews.

Grado PS500e

The Grado PS500e is an open-back, wired over-ear headphone known for its clear, lively, and well-balanced sound signature. It offers strong technical performance and a studio-leaning character that prioritizes realism and engagement, though its design focuses on audio quality rather than comfort or portability. This model delivers a refined, old-school presentation with modern finesse, making it a solid choice for critical listening at home or in the studio.

  • Pro:Detailed and balanced audio reproduction
  • Pro:Open, dynamic sound with strong realism
  • Pro:Good technical performance for its price
  • Con:No active noise cancellation or controls
  • Con:Comfort and ergonomics are weaker than sound quality
  • Con:Open-back design offers no isolation

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.