Skip to content
HearWiki

Apple AirPods Pro (2nd Gen, USB-C) vs t+a Ear (3a): which should you buy?

Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the Apple AirPods Pro (2nd Gen, USB-C) vs t+a Ear (3a), side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Apple AirPods Pro (2nd Gen, USB-C) leads on 6 of 7 measures.

  • Apple AirPods Pro (2nd Gen, USB-C)
  • t+a Ear (3a)
HearWiki score
84
-
Sound
8.5
-
Noise cancelling
9.0
-
Battery
7.5
-
Calls
8.0
-
Value
7.5
-
Price (USD)
$120
$99

Specifications

AirPods Pro (2nd Gen, USB-C)Ear (3a)
Type
True Wireless
True Wireless
Price (USD)
$120
$99
HearWiki score
84
Not scored
Released
2022
2026
Driver
11 mm dynamic
12 mm driver
Driver type
dynamic
-
Driver size
11 mm
12 mm
Drivers per side
1
-
Frequency response
20 Hz - 20 kHz
-
Impedance
16 Ω
-
Sensitivity
100 dB/mW
-
Bluetooth
5.3
-
Codecs
SBC, AAC
-
Multipoint pairing
No
-
Battery life
6 h
42 h
Wireless charging
Yes
-
Active noise cancelling
Yes
Yes
Transparency mode
Yes
-
Companion app
Yes
-
Custom EQ
No
-
Wear detection
Yes
-
Controls
touch
-
Voice assistant
Siri
-
Weight
5.3 g
-
Case weight
50.8 g
-
Water resistance
IP54
-
Foldable
No
-
Detachable cable
No
-
USB-C
Yes
-
Microphones
3
-
Microphone type
beamforming
-

What reviewers said

Apple AirPods Pro (2nd Gen, USB-C)

These wireless earbuds deliver strong active noise cancellation and a natural-sounding transparency mode, making them a solid pick for Apple users. With around 6 hours of playback per charge and a case that boosts total listening time to 30 hours, they offer dependable daily use. The IP54 rating adds some protection against sweat and splashes, while Bluetooth 5.3 ensures a stable connection for most devices.

  • Pro:Excellent active noise cancellation
  • Pro:Natural transparency mode for ambient awareness
  • Pro:Decent battery life with case
  • Con:No multipoint connection
  • Con:Limited to AAC codec
  • Con:No custom EQ in app

t+a Ear (3a)

No summary yet - we haven't aggregated enough reviews.

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.