Skip to content
HearWiki

AKG Y50BT vs Skullcandy Grind Wireless: which should you buy?

Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the AKG Y50BT vs Skullcandy Grind Wireless, side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

AKG Y50BT
Sound8.0
Battery7.5
Value8.0
Skullcandy Grind Wireless

No sub-scores yet - not enough rated reviews.

Specifications

Specification comparison of AKG Y50BT vs Skullcandy Grind Wireless
SpecAKG Y50BTSkullcandy Grind Wireless
TypeOn-EarOn-Ear
Price (USD)$83$79
HearWiki score78 / 100 · GreatNot scored
Released20162018
Audio
Driver40mm40mm
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Drivers per side22
Frequency response20Hz-20kHz20Hz-20kHz
Impedance32 Ω33 Ω
Sensitivity113 dB/mW-
Wireless
Bluetooth-Bluetooth
Bluetooth version3.0+HS-
CodecsSBC, aptX-
Multipoint pairingNo-
Battery
Battery life-12 h
Full charge time120 min-
Wireless chargingNo-
Features
Active noise cancellingNo-
Design
Weight191 g183 g
Water resistancenone-
FoldableYes-
Detachable cableYes-
Calls
Microphones1-

What reviewers said

AKG Y50BT

The AKG Y50BT is a versatile on-ear wireless headphone that delivers a lively, detailed sound with punchy bass and a slightly bright character. It offers a solid 20-hour battery life, supports aptX for better wireless audio, and can be used with a cable when the battery runs out. While it's a great value for the price, comfort may degrade during longer listening sessions, and it lacks noise cancellation.

  • Pro:Energetic, detailed sound with impactful bass
  • Pro:20-hour battery life for all-day use
  • Pro:Works both wirelessly and with a detachable cable
  • Con:No active noise cancellation
  • Con:Long sessions may cause some discomfort
  • Con:Slightly bright tuning might not suit everyone

Skullcandy Grind Wireless

The Skullcandy Grind Wireless is a budget-friendly on-ear headphone that keeps things simple with Bluetooth streaming and a compact, lightweight build. It provides around 12 hours of playback per charge and relies on its padded ear cups for passive sound isolation, making it a decent pick for casual listening on the go, though it skips active noise cancellation entirely.

  • Pro:Lightweight and portable design
  • Pro:Solid 12-hour battery life for the price
  • Pro:Simple wireless pairing with Bluetooth
  • Con:No active noise cancellation
  • Con:Average sound quality for the price
  • Con:Plastic build may feel less durable

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.