
AKG Y50BT vs Beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO: which should you buy?
On aggregated review scores the AKG Y50BT comes out ahead with an HearWiki score of 78. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.
Score breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
Specifications
| Spec | AKG Y50BT | Beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Type | On-Ear | On-Ear |
| Price (USD) | $83 | $150 |
| HearWiki score | 78 / 100 · Great | 72 / 100 · Good |
| Released | 2016 | 2019 |
| Audio | ||
| Driver | 40mm | dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 45 mm |
| Drivers per side | 2 | 2 |
| Frequency response | 20Hz-20kHz | 5Hz-24kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 45 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 113 dB/mW | - |
| Wireless | ||
| Bluetooth version | 3.0+HS | - |
| Codecs | SBC, aptX | - |
| Multipoint pairing | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Full charge time | 120 min | - |
| Wireless charging | No | - |
| Features | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Controls | - | buttons |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 191 g | 195 g |
| Water resistance | none | - |
| Foldable | Yes | No |
| Detachable cable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | - | No |
| Calls | ||
| Microphones | 1 | - |
What reviewers said
AKG Y50BT
The AKG Y50BT is a versatile on-ear wireless headphone that delivers a lively, detailed sound with punchy bass and a slightly bright character. It offers a solid 20-hour battery life, supports aptX for better wireless audio, and can be used with a cable when the battery runs out. While it's a great value for the price, comfort may degrade during longer listening sessions, and it lacks noise cancellation.
- Pro:Energetic, detailed sound with impactful bass
- Pro:20-hour battery life for all-day use
- Pro:Works both wirelessly and with a detachable cable
- Con:No active noise cancellation
- Con:Long sessions may cause some discomfort
- Con:Slightly bright tuning might not suit everyone
Beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO
This closed on-ear headphone is tuned for professional monitoring, with a bass-forward character and strong passive isolation that suits DJ work and voice tracking in noisy settings. It's a wired, utilitarian tool built for assertive sound rather than casual listening, offering good loudness even from modest sources. The design prioritizes practical stage and booth use with a detachable cable, though it skips modern conveniences like wireless or noise-canceling tech.
- Pro:Powerful, punchy bass for monitoring or DJ tasks
- Pro:Excellent passive isolation for loud environments
- Pro:Lightweight and comfortable for extended sessions
- Con:No active noise cancellation or wireless options
- Con:Bass-forward tuning may not suit neutral-critical listening
- Con:On-ear style can cause fatigue over long periods
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.
