On-Ear
AKG Y400
Not yet scored
$89
Full review dataAKG Y400 vs Beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO: which should you buy?
Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the AKG Y400 vs Beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO, side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.
On-Ear
Beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO
72Good
$150
Full review dataScore breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
AKG Y400
No sub-scores yet - not enough rated reviews.
Beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO
Sound7.0
Value7.5
Specifications
| Spec | AKG Y400 | Beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Type | On-Ear | On-Ear |
| Price (USD) | $89 | $150 |
| HearWiki score | Not scored | 72 / 100 · Good |
| Released | 2018 | 2019 |
| Audio | ||
| Driver | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver size | - | 45 mm |
| Drivers per side | - | 2 |
| Frequency response | - | 5Hz-24kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 45 Ω |
| Wireless | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | - |
| Codecs | UHQ, AAC, SBC | - |
| Multipoint pairing | - | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | - |
| Full charge time | 120 min | - |
| Features | ||
| Active noise cancelling | - | No |
| Controls | - | buttons |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 170 g | 195 g |
| Foldable | - | No |
| Detachable cable | - | Yes |
| USB-C | - | No |
What reviewers said
AKG Y400
The Austrian Y400 are lightweight wireless on-ear headphones that deliver around 20 hours of playback per charge, relying on Bluetooth 5.0 for a stable connection. They support multiple codecs including UHQ, AAC, and SBC, and their 32-ohm dynamic drivers are tuned for a neutral, balanced sound. With a quick two-hour charge time, these are a solid budget-friendly pick for everyday listening without active noise cancellation.
- Pro:Long 20-hour battery life
- Pro:Lightweight at just 170g
- Pro:Supports several high-quality codecs
- Con:No active noise cancellation
- Con:On-ear design may feel tight for some
- Con:No wired listening option
Beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO
This closed on-ear headphone is tuned for professional monitoring, with a bass-forward character and strong passive isolation that suits DJ work and voice tracking in noisy settings. It's a wired, utilitarian tool built for assertive sound rather than casual listening, offering good loudness even from modest sources. The design prioritizes practical stage and booth use with a detachable cable, though it skips modern conveniences like wireless or noise-canceling tech.
- Pro:Powerful, punchy bass for monitoring or DJ tasks
- Pro:Excellent passive isolation for loud environments
- Pro:Lightweight and comfortable for extended sessions
- Con:No active noise cancellation or wireless options
- Con:Bass-forward tuning may not suit neutral-critical listening
- Con:On-ear style can cause fatigue over long periods
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.