On-Ear
AKG Y30
72Good
$49
Full review dataAKG Y30 vs Skullcandy Grind Wireless: which should you buy?
Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the AKG Y30 vs Skullcandy Grind Wireless, side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.
Score breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
AKG Y30
Sound7.0
Calls6.0
Value8.0
Skullcandy Grind Wireless
No sub-scores yet - not enough rated reviews.
Specifications
| Spec | AKG Y30 | Skullcandy Grind Wireless |
|---|---|---|
| Type | On-Ear | On-Ear |
| Price (USD) | $49 | $79 |
| HearWiki score | 72 / 100 · Good | Not scored |
| Released | 2018 | 2018 |
| Audio | ||
| Driver | 40mm | 40mm |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Drivers per side | 1 | 2 |
| Frequency response | 13Hz-27kHz | 20Hz-20kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 33 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 115 dB/mW | - |
| Wireless | ||
| Bluetooth | - | Bluetooth |
| Multipoint pairing | No | - |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life | - | 12 h |
| Features | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | - |
| Controls | buttons | - |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 106 g | 183 g |
| Foldable | Yes | - |
| Detachable cable | No | - |
| USB-C | No | - |
| Calls | ||
| Microphones | 1 | - |
What reviewers said
AKG Y30
The AKG Y30 is a lightweight, foldable on-ear headphone that delivers a lively and open sound with a slight mid-forward tuning, making it versatile across genres. It packs practical features like an inline mic and playback controls into an affordable package, offering strong value for casual listeners despite its wired-only design and lack of noise cancellation.
- Pro:Very lightweight and portable with foldable design
- Pro:Engaging, bright sound with clear mids and usable bass
- Pro:Includes inline microphone and playback controls
- Con:No active noise cancellation
- Con:Non-detachable cable limits replacement options
- Con:On-ear fit may not suit all users for long sessions
Skullcandy Grind Wireless
The Skullcandy Grind Wireless is a budget-friendly on-ear headphone that keeps things simple with Bluetooth streaming and a compact, lightweight build. It provides around 12 hours of playback per charge and relies on its padded ear cups for passive sound isolation, making it a decent pick for casual listening on the go, though it skips active noise cancellation entirely.
- Pro:Lightweight and portable design
- Pro:Solid 12-hour battery life for the price
- Pro:Simple wireless pairing with Bluetooth
- Con:No active noise cancellation
- Con:Average sound quality for the price
- Con:Plastic build may feel less durable
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.