Skip to content
HearWiki

AKG N5005 vs Hidizs MP145 PRO: which should you buy?

On aggregated review scores the AKG N5005 comes out ahead with an HearWiki score of 84. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.

Our pick: AKG N5005 - Great overall at around $285.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

AKG N5005
Sound9.0
Battery6.0
Value6.5
Hidizs MP145 PRO
Sound8.2
Value8.0

Specifications

Specification comparison of AKG N5005 vs Hidizs MP145 PRO
SpecAKG N5005Hidizs MP145 PRO
TypeWired IEMsWired IEMs
Price (USD)$285$220
HearWiki score84 / 100 · Great78 / 100 · Great
Released20182026
Audio
Driver1 dynamic + 4 balanced armature14.5 mm planar magnetic driver
Driver size9.2 mm14.5 mm
Drivers per side51
Frequency response10Hz-40kHz20Hz-40kHz
Impedance18 Ω30 Ω
Sensitivity116 dB/mW104 dB/mW
Wireless
Bluetooth4.1-
CodecsAptX, SBC-
Multipoint pairingNo-
Battery
Battery life8 h-
Full charge time120 min-
Features
Active noise cancellingNo-
Controls-none
Design
Weight11.4 g19 g
Detachable cableYesYes
USB-C-No

What reviewers said

AKG N5005

The AKG N5005 is a premium hybrid in-ear monitor that pairs a dynamic driver with four balanced armatures for detailed, reference-grade sound. It offers versatile tuning options and a strong accessory set, though its wired-only connection and lack of noise cancellation may limit its appeal for some listeners. Priced around $199, it delivers high-end performance that rivals far more expensive models.

  • Pro:Excellent clarity and detail retrieval
  • Pro:Multiple tuning filters for sound customization
  • Pro:Solid build quality with detachable cable
  • Con:No wireless or noise-canceling support
  • Con:Lacks aptX HD codec
  • Con:Price may still feel steep for some

Hidizs MP145 PRO

The Hidizs MP145 PRO is a wired single-planar IEM that delivers a bright, mid-focused sound with tight bass, clear vocals, and detailed treble, backed by strong technical performance in layering and imaging. Its near-neutral tuning suits listeners who prioritize accuracy over warmth, though the bulky shell and potentially fatiguing upper frequencies may not suit everyone. At its price, it offers solid value for those who can manage the fit and forgiving source material.

  • Pro:Excellent clarity and detail retrieval
  • Pro:Rich, forward mids with strong vocal presence
  • Pro:Tight and controlled bass response
  • Con:Large shell may be uncomfortable for smaller ears
  • Con:Upper treble can cause fatigue on bright tracks
  • Con:Soundstage feels somewhat confined

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.