Skip to content
HearWiki

AKG K371 vs Nectar Hive: which should you buy?

On aggregated review scores the Nectar Hive comes out ahead with an HearWiki score of 85. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.

Our pick: Nectar Hive - Outstanding overall at around $197.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

AKG K371
Sound8.0
Value8.5
Nectar Hive
Sound9.0
Value7.0

Specifications

Specification comparison of AKG K371 vs Nectar Hive
SpecAKG K371Nectar Hive
TypeOver-EarOver-Ear
Price (USD)$199$197
HearWiki score78 / 100 · Great85 / 100 · Outstanding
Released20202022
Audio
DriverDynamicElectrostatic
Driver size50 mm-
Drivers per side1-
Frequency response5Hz-40kHz20Hz-7kHz
Sound signature-Bright neutral
Impedance32 Ω-
Sensitivity99 dB/mW-
Sensitivity (dB/Vrms)114-
Wireless
Multipoint pairingNo-
Features
Active noise cancellingNo-
Design
Weight255 g370 g

What reviewers said

AKG K371

The AKG K371 is a wired, closed-back over-ear headphone that delivers a lively, bass-forward sound while maintaining accurate reproduction across a wide frequency range. Its lightweight build, comfortable fit, and studio-friendly tuning make it a versatile pick for both casual listening and professional monitoring at a reasonable price. With a 50mm dynamic driver and low 32-ohm impedance, it pairs easily with most devices without needing extra amplification.

  • Pro:Accurate, well-balanced sound with punchy bass
  • Pro:Lightweight and comfortable for extended sessions
  • Pro:Strong value for the price in its class
  • Con:No wireless or multipoint connectivity
  • Con:Lacks active noise cancellation
  • Con:Build feels decent but not premium

Nectar Hive

The Nectar Hive is a wired electrostatic over-ear headphone priced around $600, weighing just 370 grams. It delivers a bright neutral sound signature with a frequency response spanning 20Hz to 7kHz, offering a detailed and airy presentation that leans toward analytical clarity. This model earns high marks for its tonal balance and technical performance, making it a strong contender in its price bracket for listeners who prefer a crisp, revealing sound.

  • Pro:Excellent tonal accuracy and neutrality
  • Pro:Impressive technical detail retrieval
  • Pro:Featherweight design for comfort
  • Con:Bright tilt may be fatiguing for some
  • Con:Limited bass impact due to electrostatic nature
  • Con:Requires dedicated amplifier for proper use

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.