Skip to content
HearWiki

Abyss Diana V3 MR vs STAX SR-X9000: which should you buy?

On aggregated review scores the STAX SR-X9000 comes out ahead with an HearWiki score of 88. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.

Our pick: STAX SR-X9000 - Outstanding overall at around $5050.

Score breakdown

Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.

Abyss Diana V3 MR
Sound8.7
Value6.5
STAX SR-X9000
Sound9.5
Value5.0

Specifications

Specification comparison of Abyss Diana V3 MR vs STAX SR-X9000
SpecAbyss Diana V3 MRSTAX SR-X9000
TypeOver-EarOver-Ear
Price (USD)$2995$5050
HearWiki score84 / 100 · Great88 / 100 · Outstanding
Released20232021
Audio
Driverplanarelectrostatic
Driver size63 mm-
Drivers per side12
Frequency response5Hz-55kHz5Hz-42,000Hz
Impedance30 Ω145000 Ω
Sensitivity93 dB/mW-
Wireless
Multipoint pairingNoNo
Features
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Design
Weight2268 g432 g
Detachable cableYes-
Model codeDiana MRx-

What reviewers said

Abyss Diana V3 MR

The Diana MR is a premium planar over-ear that refines the brand's signature tuning into a smoother, more universally appealing sound, blending deep bass, rich mids, and crisp highs with wide, immersive imaging. While it's easier to drive than some flagship models, it still benefits from quality amplification, and its hefty build plus proprietary cable and average comfort are notable trade-offs for its price.

  • Pro:Smooth, well-balanced tuning with strong bass and clear highs
  • Pro:Excellent imaging and immersive soundstage
  • Pro:Detachable cable and multiple pad/finish options
  • Con:Heavy and may lack sufficient padding for long sessions
  • Con:Proprietary cable limits aftermarket options
  • Con:Still requires a capable amplifier for best results

STAX SR-X9000

The STAX SR-X9000 is a top-tier electrostatic headphone that excels at revealing fine detail, ambient cues, and instrumental nuance, delivering an exceptionally transparent and spacious soundstage. It offers outstanding speed, transient response, and realism, making it ideal for classical and spatially demanding music. However, it requires a dedicated energizer/driver unit, pushing the total system cost far beyond the already steep headphone price.

  • Pro:Exceptional detail retrieval and transparency
  • Pro:Huge, three-dimensional soundstage with precise imaging
  • Pro:Fast transient response and realistic timbre
  • Con:Requires separate electrostatic driver unit
  • Con:Very high total system cost
  • Con:No noise cancellation or wireless convenience

Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.

Compare something else

Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.