
Abyss Diana V3 MR (Stealth) vs STAX SR-X9000: which should you buy?
On aggregated review scores the STAX SR-X9000 comes out ahead with an HearWiki score of 88. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.
Score breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
Specifications
| Spec | Abyss Diana V3 MR (Stealth) | STAX SR-X9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Over-Ear | Over-Ear |
| Price (USD) | $2995 | $5050 |
| HearWiki score | 84 / 100 · Great | 88 / 100 · Outstanding |
| Released | 2024 | 2021 |
| Audio | ||
| Driver | planar | electrostatic |
| Driver size | 63 mm | - |
| Drivers per side | 1 | 2 |
| Frequency response | 5 Hz – 55 kHz | 5Hz-42,000Hz |
| Impedance | 30 Ω | 145000 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 93 dB/mW | - |
| Wireless | ||
| Multipoint pairing | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Voice assistant | none | - |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 2268 g | 432 g |
| Detachable cable | Yes | - |
| Model code | Abyss Diana MRx | - |
What reviewers said
Abyss Diana V3 MR (Stealth)
The Diana V3 MR is a premium planar headphone that blends high-end fidelity with a more forgiving, musical tuning, making it one of the most approachable models in its lineup. It offers strong technical performance, including detailed imaging and an expansive soundstage, while remaining relatively easy to drive for its class. Its main trade-offs are comfort-related, with a heavier build and limited padding, plus a proprietary cable system that may limit aftermarket options.
- Pro:Engaging, smooth sound with excellent bass and treble detail
- Pro:Wide, holographic soundstage and precise imaging
- Pro:Easier to drive than many high-end planars, with flexible pairing
- Con:Comfort can suffer due to limited padding and significant weight
- Con:Proprietary cable system restricts replacement choices
- Con:Lacks wireless or noise-canceling features at a premium price
STAX SR-X9000
The STAX SR-X9000 is a top-tier electrostatic headphone that excels at revealing fine detail, ambient cues, and instrumental nuance, delivering an exceptionally transparent and spacious soundstage. It offers outstanding speed, transient response, and realism, making it ideal for classical and spatially demanding music. However, it requires a dedicated energizer/driver unit, pushing the total system cost far beyond the already steep headphone price.
- Pro:Exceptional detail retrieval and transparency
- Pro:Huge, three-dimensional soundstage with precise imaging
- Pro:Fast transient response and realistic timbre
- Con:Requires separate electrostatic driver unit
- Con:Very high total system cost
- Con:No noise cancellation or wireless convenience
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.
