
Abyss Diana V3 DZ (Carbon) vs STAX SR-X9000: which should you buy?
On aggregated review scores the STAX SR-X9000 comes out ahead with an HearWiki score of 88. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.
Score breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
Specifications
| Spec | Abyss Diana V3 DZ (Carbon) | STAX SR-X9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Over-Ear | Over-Ear |
| Price (USD) | $3995 | $5050 |
| HearWiki score | 84 / 100 · Great | 88 / 100 · Outstanding |
| Released | 2024 | 2021 |
| Audio | ||
| Driver | planar | electrostatic |
| Driver size | 63 mm | - |
| Drivers per side | 2 | 2 |
| Frequency response | 5Hz-65kHz | 5Hz-42,000Hz |
| Impedance | 50 Ω | 145000 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 92 dB/mW | - |
| Wireless | ||
| Multipoint pairing | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 379 g | 432 g |
| Model code | Diana DZ | - |
What reviewers said
Abyss Diana V3 DZ (Carbon)
The Abyss Diana V3 DZ is a premium planar headphone that delivers a wide, holographic soundstage with exceptional clarity and a neutral, refined tonal balance. Its lightweight frame and improved comfort make it a notable step forward from earlier Diana models, though it demands high-quality source gear to fully shine. It stands as a strong contender in the ultra-high-end category for those seeking technical precision over a vocal-forward signature.
- Pro:Spacious, holographic imaging with strong detail retrieval
- Pro:Neutral yet refined tuning that avoids listener fatigue
- Pro:Lightweight build with improved ergonomics and comfort
- Con:Performance heavily depends on premium source equipment
- Con:Not ideal for listeners who prioritize upfront, vocal-centric sound
- Con:High price point limits accessibility
STAX SR-X9000
The STAX SR-X9000 is a top-tier electrostatic headphone that excels at revealing fine detail, ambient cues, and instrumental nuance, delivering an exceptionally transparent and spacious soundstage. It offers outstanding speed, transient response, and realism, making it ideal for classical and spatially demanding music. However, it requires a dedicated energizer/driver unit, pushing the total system cost far beyond the already steep headphone price.
- Pro:Exceptional detail retrieval and transparency
- Pro:Huge, three-dimensional soundstage with precise imaging
- Pro:Fast transient response and realistic timbre
- Con:Requires separate electrostatic driver unit
- Con:Very high total system cost
- Con:No noise cancellation or wireless convenience
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.
