Over-Ear
Abyss 1266 Phi TC
Not yet scored
$5995
Full review dataAbyss 1266 Phi TC vs STAX SR-009S: which should you buy?
Specs, scores and condensed review verdicts for the Abyss 1266 Phi TC vs STAX SR-009S, side by side. Where a product has no HearWiki score yet, not enough reviews have been aggregated to rate it.
Over-Ear
STAX SR-009S
88Outstanding
$3290
Full review dataScore breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
Abyss 1266 Phi TC
No sub-scores yet - not enough rated reviews.
STAX SR-009S
Sound9.5
Value6.0
Specifications
| Spec | Abyss 1266 Phi TC | STAX SR-009S |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Over-Ear | Over-Ear |
| Price (USD) | $5995 | $3290 |
| HearWiki score | Not scored | 88 / 100 · Outstanding |
| Released | 2018 | 2018 |
| Audio | ||
| Driver | planar | electrostatic |
| Driver size | 66 mm | - |
| Drivers per side | 2 | 1 |
| Frequency response | 5Hz-45kHz | 5Hz-42kHz |
| Impedance | 50 Ω | 145000 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 88 dB/mW | 101 dB/mW |
| Wireless | ||
| Multipoint pairing | - | No |
| Features | ||
| Active noise cancelling | - | No |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 640 g | 589.67 g |
| Detachable cable | Yes | - |
| USB-C | No | - |
| Balanced connection | Yes | - |
What reviewers said
Abyss 1266 Phi TC
No summary yet - we haven't aggregated enough reviews.
STAX SR-009S
The STAX SR-009S is a premium electrostatic headphone that refines the original SR-009 formula with a slightly smoother, less bright tuning while retaining exceptional speed, detail, and openness. It offers a wide, precisely imaged soundstage and a very comfortable fit, making it a top-tier choice for critical listening, though it demands high-quality recordings and a dedicated amplifier system to shine. Its performance places it among the very best headphones available, with only the newer X9000 potentially edging it out in some respects.
- Pro:Extremely fast and detailed electrostatic sound
- Pro:Wide, immersive soundstage with precise imaging
- Pro:Comfortable fit despite large earcups
- Con:Very revealing of poor-quality recordings
- Con:Requires specialized electrostatic amplifier, adding cost and complexity
- Con:High price point limits accessibility
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.