
1MORE Piston Fit vs KZ Ling Long: which should you buy?
On aggregated review scores the KZ Ling Long comes out ahead with an HearWiki score of 72. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.
Score breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
Specifications
| Spec | 1MORE Piston Fit | KZ Ling Long |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Wired IEMs | Wired IEMs |
| Price (USD) | $10 | $16 |
| HearWiki score | 68 / 100 · Good | 72 / 100 · Good |
| Released | 2020 | 2024 |
| Audio | ||
| Driver | dynamic | XUN-6 external magnetic dynamic unit |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 6 mm |
| Drivers per side | 2 | 1 |
| Frequency response | 20Hz-20kHz | 20Hz-40kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 25 Ω |
| Sensitivity | - | 103 dB/mW |
| Wireless | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | - |
| Codecs | SBC | - |
| Multipoint pairing | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | - |
| Features | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Controls | buttons | none |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 14 g | 83 g |
| Water resistance | IPX4 | - |
| Detachable cable | No | Yes |
| USB-C | No | No |
| Calls | ||
| Microphones | 1 | - |
What reviewers said
1MORE Piston Fit
The 1MORE Piston Fit is an ultra-budget wireless earphone that delivers a lively, bass-forward sound for its price, though it falls short of neutral or refined tuning. With Bluetooth 5.0, an IPX4 rating, and a lightweight 14g build, it covers practical basics for casual listening, but its 8-hour battery and SBC-only support keep it firmly in entry-level territory. Overall, it's a decent value pick for those prioritizing affordability and a fun sound signature over accuracy or premium features.
- Pro:Very affordable price point
- Pro:Punchy, energetic bass response
- Pro:Lightweight and comfortable in-ear fit
- Con:Muddy midrange and sharp treble
- Con:Battery life is only average at 8 hours
- Con:No support for advanced codecs like AAC or aptX
KZ Ling Long
The KZ Ling Long is a budget-friendly wired IEM with a compact bullet-style shell and a warm, engaging sound signature. It offers solid build quality and good value, though its technical abilities are modest and it can get congested on complex tracks. Its open-back-inspired design gives a notably spacious soundstage for the price, but clarity and refinement are not its strengths.
- Pro:Very good build quality for the price
- Pro:Warm, enjoyable tuning with solid bass
- Pro:Spacious soundstage for an inexpensive IEM
- Con:Average technical performance and detail retrieval
- Con:Can sound congested on busy, dense music
- Con:No inline controls or microphone
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.
