
1MORE E1001 vs KZ PR3: which should you buy?
On aggregated review scores the 1MORE E1001 comes out ahead with an HearWiki score of 82. The full breakdown - sub-scores, specs and what reviewers actually said - is below.
Score breakdown
Each axis is a 0–10 blend of what reviewers scored, not a lab measurement.
Specifications
| Spec | 1MORE E1001 | KZ PR3 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Wired IEMs | Wired IEMs |
| Price (USD) | $52 | $47 |
| HearWiki score | 82 / 100 · Great | 72 / 100 · Good |
| Released | 2018 | 2023 |
| Audio | ||
| Driver | 1 dynamic + 2 balanced armature hybrid | Planar |
| Driver size | 16 mm | 13.2 mm |
| Drivers per side | 3 | 1 |
| Frequency response | 20Hz-40kHz | 20Hz-40kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 15 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 99 dB/mW | 98 dB/mW |
| Wireless | ||
| Bluetooth | none | - |
| Multipoint pairing | No | - |
| Features | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | - |
| Controls | buttons | buttons |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 18 g | - |
| Water resistance | none | - |
| USB-C | No | - |
| Calls | ||
| Microphones | 1 | 1 |
What reviewers said
1MORE E1001
The 1MORE E1001 is a wired hybrid in-ear monitor that pairs a 16mm dynamic driver with two balanced armatures to deliver a rich, detailed sound signature at a budget-friendly price. Its all-metal build, comfortable fit, and generous accessory package make it a compelling pick for listeners seeking premium features without the premium cost. While its tuning is generally balanced and engaging, it does have some minor limitations in soundstage width and cable handling.
- Pro:Excellent value for a triple-driver hybrid design
- Pro:Solid all-metal construction with a premium feel
- Pro:Comfortable, secure fit for extended listening
- Con:Cable is prone to noticeable microphonics
- Con:Soundstage feels somewhat narrow and intimate
- Con:Instrument separation is only average for the price
KZ PR3
The KZ PR3 is a budget-friendly planar in-ear monitor that punches above its weight in raw technical performance, offering impressive detail retrieval, crisp imaging, and a wide soundstage for the price. However, its tuning leans bright and lean, with a thin bass response and occasional upper-mid peakiness that can make it sound harsh or fatiguing, making it a great choice for analytical listeners but not for those seeking a warm or natural sound.
- Pro:Excellent resolution and micro-detail
- Pro:Wide, well-defined soundstage
- Pro:Fast, precise transient response
- Con:Bright, potentially fatiguing treble
- Con:Thin mid-bass and low-end weight
- Con:Upper-mid shoutiness on some tracks
Summaries are AI-condensed and paraphrased from published reviews and specs - not original hands-on testing. More on our method.
Compare something else
Swap either side out, or start again from the picker.
